In preparation for setting up the locale files with the right working week values, I thought I'd do a quick check on our l10n status against the official ISO standard list and the UN list of recognised entities. Of the 246 currently on the ISO list, we have locale files for 228 So who are we missing?
OK, so there's a fair number of UK, US, and French territories in there, and some very remote uninhabited islands that are clearly to be considered as part of their parent country for locale purposes. Yet they are officially recognised to some extent and many have the various trappings like flags and limited self-governance. Where to draw the line is tricky, but if you're a KDE user from one of these territories and want to make a case for inclusion, then I'm willing to listen. Jersey, Gurnsey and the Isle of Man could make good cases, as could the more autonomous French Collectivities. Anyone claiming to be from Bouvet Island will be ignored as not existing :-)
The notable one here is Sierra Leone which undoubtably should be included. Another difference is we have an old locale code of TP for East Timor, when the official code is now TL and the official name is now Timor-Leste. With the feature and string freeze kicking in tomorrow, it's probably a bit late to fix these now, but we'll have to sort it in 4.3.
Comments
This area of KDE need much more publicity...
Like you indirectly indicated the i18n coverage of KDE is really huge, nevertheless it's one of the most often ignored features of KDE as a project.
http://i18n.kde.org/stats/gui/trunk-kde4/toplist/
If I needed to pick one single reason for a Qt app joining as an official part of KDE I wouldn't pick KDE's framework, I'd pick KDE's i18n and all it's maintainers who make this positive crazyness possible.
Post new comment